![]() ![]() The issues of advocacy versus truth in evaluation and between evaluating programs versus empowering people to evaluate their own programs.įeatures thoughtfully written introductions to each of the main sections that provide a context and synthesis of the various evaluators' chapters. They examine the following: What makes evaluation different from other disciplines? The links and differences between evaluation and auditing professions? Which activities have priority in evaluation, under what circumstances, and for what purposes? New methodological approaches to doing evaluation. What methodological tools have been most useful in doing evaluation? What are some of the new methodologies that are being used and developed? Will the types of things evaluated expand from programs, personnel, and products to foreign aid, medical technology, environmental interventions, and World Bank loan programs? What will evaluation be like in the 21st century? These impressive evaluators from around the globe explore how evaluation has come to be what it is today and what the professional evaluation landscape will be like in the future.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |